World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.wjon.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 4, August 2020, pages 139-149


Sarcopenia and Visceral Adiposity Are Not Independent Prognostic Markers for Extensive Disease of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Centered Retrospective Cohort Study

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival according to BMI (a), PMI (b), IMAC (c) and VSR (d). BMI: body mass index; PMI: psoas muscle index; IMAC: intramuscular adipose tissue content; VSR: visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of progression-free survival according to BMI (a), PMI (b), IMAC (c) and VSR (d). BMI: body mass index; PMI: psoas muscle index; IMAC: intramuscular adipose tissue content; VSR: visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics According to BMI
 
BMIP
< 18.5≥ 18.5
aFisher’s exact test; bMann-Whitney U test. BMI: body mass index; CR: complete response; CS: current smoker; DCR: disease control rate; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; Ex: ex-smoker; IQR: interquartile range; NE: not evaluated; NS: non-smoker; ORR: overall response rate; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; ULN: upper limit of normal range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
N16112
Backgrounds
  Sex (N), men/women10/691/210.10a
  Age (years)
    Median (IQR)72.5 (67.8 - 76)71.5 (64.8 - 78)0.33b
    < 75/≥ 75 years (N)9/770/420.78a
  Smoking status, NS/Ex/CS/unknown1/4/11/02/37/72/10.45a
  ECOG-PS, 0 - 1/2/37/7/270/24/180.21a
  c-stage, IIIB/IV1/1518/940.46a
  Metastatic sites
    Brain2220.74a
    Liver6310.56a
    Bone3150.70a
  BMI, median (IQR)16.9 (16.1 - 17.3)23.1 (20.6 - 25.8)< 0.01b
Treatment
  Platinum-based, cisplatin/carboplatin2/1429/830.35a
  Partner drugs, etoposide/irinotecan0/1615/970.21a
  Efficacy
    CR/PR/SD/PD/NE0/7/2/4/32/69/15/17/9
    ORR (%)43.863.40.17a
    DCR (%)56.276.80.12a
  Second or later line (N)7620.43a
    Amrubicin (N)5440.60a
    Topotecan (N)0130.37a
    Irinotecan (N)070.60a
Pretreatment laboratory data
  Albumin (g/dL)
    Median (IQR)3.1 (2.8 - 3.9)3.7 (3.2 - 3.9)0.13b
    ≥ 3.5/< 3.5 g/dL (N)6/1068/440.11a
  LDH (IU/L)
    Median (IQR)266 (201 - 492)286 (217 - 402)0.94b
    < ULN/≥ ULN6/1031/810.56a

 

Table 2. Baseline Characteristics According to PMI
 
PMIP
LowHigh
aFisher’s exact test; bMann-Whitney U test. BMI: body mass index; PMI: psoas muscle index; CR: complete response; CS: current smoker; DCR: disease control rate; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; Ex: ex-smoker; IQR: interquartile range; NE: not evaluated; NS: non-smoker; ORR: overall response rate; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; ULN: upper limit of normal range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
N9335
Backgrounds
  Sex (N), men/women75/1826/90.47a
  Age (years)
    Median (IQR)71 (66 - 76)72 (63.5 - 79)0.79b
    < 75/≥ 75 years (N)59/3420/150.55a
  Smoking status, NS/Ex/CS/unknown1/29/62/12/12/21/00.43a
  ECOG-PS, 0 - 1/2/351/25/1726/6/30.15a
  c-stage, IIIB/IV14/795/301.00a
  Metastatic sites
    Brain1770.80a
    Liver2980.39a
    Bone1440.79a
  BMI
    Median (IQR)21.0 (19.1 - 24.0)24.6 (23.2 - 27.1)< 0.01b
    ≥ 18.5/< 18.578/1534/10.07a
Treatment
  Platinum-based, cisplatin/carboplatin22/719/260.82a
  Partner drugs, etoposide/irinotecan81/1232/30.76a
  Efficacy
    CR/PR/SD/PD/NE0/57/10/16/102/19/7/5/2
    ORR (%)61.360.01.00a
    DCR (%)72.080.00.50a
  Second or later line (N)46230.12a
    Amrubicin (N)34150.55a
    Topotecan (N)940.75a
    Irinotecan (N)521.00a
Pretreatment laboratory data
  Albumin (g/dL)
    Median (IQR)3.6 (3.0 - 3.9)3.7 (3.3 - 3.9)0.57b
    ≥ 3.5/< 3.5 g/dL (N)49/4425/100.07a
  LDH (IU/L)
    Median (IQR)282 (218 - 410)323 (205 - 410)0.69b
    < ULN/≥ ULN26/6711/240.83a

 

Table 3. Baseline Characteristics According to IMAC
 
IMACP
LowHigh
aFisher’s exact test; bMann-Whitney U test. IMAC: intramuscular adipose tissue content; BMI: body mass index; CR: complete response; CS: current smoker; DCR: disease control rate; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; Ex: ex-smoker; IQR: interquartile range; NE: not evaluated; NS: non-smoker; ORR: overall response rate; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; ULN: upper limit of normal range.
N11414
Backgrounds
  Sex (N), men/women89/2512/20.73a
  Age (years)
    Median (IQR)71.5 (66 - 76)76.5 (66.5 - 81.8)0.15b
    < 75/≥ 75 years (N)72/427/70.39a
  Smoking status, NS/Ex/CS2/36/75/11/5/8/00.41a
  ECOG-PS, 0 - 1/2/371/27/166/4/40.27a
  c-stage, IIIB/IV17/972/121.00a
  Metastatic sites
    Brain2400.07a
    Liver3160.23a
    Bone1710.69a
  BMI
    Median (IQR)21.8 (19.5 - 24.5)24.1 (22.9 - 25.7)0.06b
    ≥ 18.5/< 18.598/1614/00.21a
Treatment
  Platinum-based, cisplatin/carboplatin29/852/120.52a
  Partner drugs, etoposide/irinotecan99/1514/00.37a
  Efficacy
    CR/PR/SD/PD/NE2/69/14/18/110/7/3/3/1
    ORR (%)62.350.00.40a
    DCR (%)74.671.40.76a
  Second or later line (N)6270.78a
    Amrubicin (N)4360.77a
    Topotecan (N)1211.00a
    Irinotecan (N)701.00a
Pretreatment laboratory data
  Albumin (g/dL)
    Median (IQR)3.7 (3.1 - 3.9)3.4 (2.9 - 3.8)0.21b
    ≥ 3.5/< 3.5 g/dL (N)68/466/80.26a
  LDH (IU/L)
    Median (IQR)285 (210 - 428)292 (225 - 388)0.79b
    < ULN/≥ ULN33/814/101.00a

 

Table 4. Baseline Characteristics According to VSR
 
VSRP
LowHigh
aFisher’s exact test; bMann-Whitney U test. VSR: visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio; BMI: body mass index; CR: complete response; CS: current smoker; DCR: disease control rate; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; Ex: ex-smoker; IQR: interquartile range; NE: not evaluated; NS: non-smoker; ORR: overall response rate; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease; ULN: upper limit of normal range; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
N7256
Backgrounds
  Sex (N), men/women52/2049/70.049a
  Age (years)
    Median (IQR)69 (64.8 - 76)73.5 (67.8 - 78.3)0.04b
    < 75/≥ 75 years (N)50/2229/270.046a
  Smoking status, NS/Ex/CS1/22/49/02/19/34/10.54a
  ECOG-PS, 0 - 1/2/340/19/1337/12/70.47a
  c-stage, IIIB/IV10/629/470.80a
  Metastatic sites
    Brain1590.65a
    Liver20170.85a
    Bone1081.00a
  BMI
    Median (IQR)21.1 (19.1 - 24.3)23.3 (20.9 - 26.2)0.02b
    ≥ 18.5/< 18.560/1252/40.18a
Treatment
  Platinum-based, cisplatin/carboplatin17/5514/421.00a
  Partner drugs, etoposide/irinotecan65/748/80.58a
  Efficacy
    CR/PR/SD/PD/NE1/44/6/14/71/32/11/7/5
    ORR (%)62.558.90.72a
    DCR (%)70.878.60.42a
  Second or later line (N)37320.59a
    Amrubicin (N)25240.37a
    Topotecan (N)761.00a
    Irinotecan (N)520.47a
Pretreatment Laboratory data
  Albumin (g/dL)
    Median (IQR)3.4 (3.1 - 3.9)3.8 (3.2 - 4.0)0.15b
    ≥ 3.5/< 3.5 g/dL (N)35/3739/170.02a
  LDH (IU/L)
    Median (IQR)270 (217 - 430)304 (209 - 402)0.63b
    < ULN/≥ ULN21/5116/401.00a

 

Table 5. Adjusted Hazard Ratios of Indexes of Sarcopenia and Visceral Obesity for Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival
 
VariablesPFS, HR (95% CI)POS, HR (95% CI)P
Multivariate adjustment for age (< 75 vs. 5 75 years), serum albumin (≥ 3.5 vs. < 3.5 g/dL), LDH (≤ UNL vs. > UNL), c-stage (IIIB vs. IV) and ECOG-PS (0 - 1 vs. 2 - 4). BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status; HR: hazard ratio; IMAC: intramuscular adipose tissue content; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PMI: psoas muscle index; UNL: upper limit of normal range; VSR: visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival.
BMI
  ≥ 18.51 (reference)1 (reference)
  < 18.51.36 (0.79 - 2.34)0.271.47 (0.83 - 2.57)0.18
PMI (cm2/m2)
  High1 (reference)1 (reference)
  Low1.44 (0.94 - 2.19)0.091.32 (0.84 - 2.07)0.23
IMAC
  Low1 (reference)1 (reference)
  High0.97 (0.51 - 1.84)0.930.87 (0.45 - 1.69)0.68
VSR
  Low1 (reference)1 (reference)
  High1.08 (0.73 - 1.59)0.710.96 (0.63 - 1.47)0.86

 

Table 6. Review of Studies That Evaluated CT-Determined Sarcopenia in SCLC
 
Author (year)PatientsSarcopenia definitionsSurvival comparison; sarcopenia vs. non-sarcopeniaMultivariate analyses
BSC: best supportive care; chemo: chemotherapy; CI: confidence interval; CRT: chemo-radiotherapy; CS: cachexia score; ED: extensive disease; FI: fat index; HR: hazard ratio; LD: limited disease; MI: muscle index; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; PMI: psoas muscle index; SCLC: small-cell lung cancer; SMI: skeletal muscle index; CT: computed tomography.
Kim et al (2015) [7]149 SCLC; male (85.2%), ED (67.8%), chemo alone (48.3%), CRT (29.5%), BSC alone (20.8%)L3MI, sarcopenia (79.2%)OS, 8.6 vs. 16.8 months, P = 0.031Non-sarcopenia vs. sarcopenia; OS, HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04 - 2.72, P = 0.034
Go et al (2016) [8]117 male SCLC; ED (54.7%), CRT (45.3%)SMI of pectoralis muscles, sarcopenia (24.8%)PFS, 6.0 vs. 7.5 months, P = 0.009; OS, 10.5 vs. 13.5 months, P = 0.052Sarcopenia with low NLR + non-sarcopenia vs. sarcopenic with high NLR; PFS, HR 3.805, 95% CI 1.774 - 8.158, P = 0.001; OS, HR 2.230, 95% CI 1.048 - 4.743, P = 0.037
Kim et al (2017) [9]127 male SCLC; ED (69.3%), chemo alone (48.0%), CRT (29.1%), BSC alone (21.3%)CS defined by L3MI and L3FI; CS0 (13.4%), CS1 (74.8%), CS2 (11.8%)OS, 5.0 (CS2) vs. 8.9 (CS1) vs. 18.3 months (CS0), P = 0.007CS0 vs. CS1, OS, HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.05 - 3.78, P = 0.036; CS0 vs. CS2, OS, HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.14 - 5.89, P = 0.023
Ours (2020)128 ED-SCLC; male (78.9%), chemo alone (100%)PMI; low PMI (72.7%)PFS, 4.5 vs. 5.2 months, P = 0.17; OS, 8.8 vs. 11.4 months, P = 0.17High PMI vs. low PMI; PFS, HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.94 - 2.19, P = 0.09; OS, HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.84 - 2.07, P = 0.23

 

Table 7. Review of Studies That Evaluated BMI in Untreated SCLC
 
Author (year)PatientsBMISurvival comparisonUnivariate analysesMultivariate analyses
BSC: best supportive care; CBDCA: carboplatin; Chemo: chemotherapy; CI: confidence interval; CRT: chemo-radiotherapy; ED: extensive disease; LD: limited disease; HR: hazard ratio; NA: not accessed; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; SCLC: small-cell lung cancer; VP-16: etoposide; BMI: body mass index.
Georgiadis et al (1995) [29]262 SCLC; male (63%), ED (44%), chemo alone (61%), CRT (39%)Obese (27.1%), men ≥ 27.8, women ≥ 27.3; severely obese (10.7%), men ≥ 31.1, women ≥ 32.3Not described in details, but insignificantNANA
Kim et al (2015) [7]149 SCLC; male (85.2%), ED (67.8%), chemo alone (48.3%), CRT (29.5%), BSC alone (20.8%)≥ 23 vs. < 23 (59.1%)NAOS; HR 1.19 (95% CI 0.83 - 1.72), P = 0.340NA
Go et al (2016) [8]117 male SCLC; ED (54.7%), CRT (45.3%)≥ 18.5 vs. < 18.5 (10.3%)NAPFS, HR 1.749 (95% CI 0.930 - 3.291), P = 0.083; OS, HR 1.077 (95% CI 0.554 - 2.096), P = 0.827PFS, 1.001 (0.500 - 2.006), P = 0.998; OS, not assessed
Kim et al (2017) [9]127 male SCLC; ED (69.3%), chemo alone (48.0%), CRT (29.1%), BSC alone (21.3%)≥ 18.5 vs. < 18.5 (15.0%)NAOS, HR 2.32 (95% CI 1.38 - 3.89), P < 0.001NA
Abdel-Rahman (2018) [28]455 ED-SCLC in a phase III trial; male (72.5%), CBDCA + VP-16 (100%)< 25 (48.1%) vs. ≥ 25NAPFS, HR 0.891 (95% CI 0.644 - 1.234), P = 0.487; OS, HR 0.856 (95% CI 0.678 - 1.082), P = 0.194PFS, OS; NA
Shen et al (2019) [30]178 SCLC; male (79.78%), ED (71.91%), VP-16 containing chemo alone18.5 - 24 (56.74%) vs. < 18.5 (6.74%) vs. ≥ 24P = 0.4107PFS, 18.5 - 24 vs. < 18.5, P = 0.851; 18.5 - 24 vs. ≥ 24, P = 0.212NA
Shepshelovich et al (2019) [31]2,787 SCLC from 16 studies; male (56%), ED (59%),< 18.5 vs. normalOS (ED), P < 0.001;
OS (LD), P = 0.002
HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.89 - 1.51), P = 0.28HR 1.20 (95% CI 0.92 - 1.6), P = 0.18
25 - 30 vs. normalHR 0.97 (95% CI 0.87 - 1.07), P = 0.51HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.84 - 1.0), P = 0.20
> 30 vs. normalHR 1.05 (95% CI 0.94 - 1.19), P = 0.39HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.95 - 1.2), P = 0.24
Ours (2020)128 ED-SCLC; male (78.9%), chemo alone (100%)≥ 18.5 vs. < 18.5 (12.5%)PFS, P = 0.39; OS, P = 0.07NAPFS, 1.36 (0.79 - 2.34), P = 0.27; OS, 1.47 (0.83 - 2.57), P = 0.18