World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.wjon.org

Original Article

Volume 14, Number 4, August 2023, pages 285-299


FOS-Like Antigen 1 Expression Was Associated With Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical staining of FOSL1 in HCC tumor tissues (× 400) showed weak nuclear expression for FOSL1 (a), moderate nuclear expression (b), strong nuclear expression for FOSL1 (c), weak cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 (d), moderate cytoplasmic expression (e), and strong cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 (f). FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical staining of FOSL1 showed strong cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 in liver cirrhosis (a) (× 100 power magnification), strong cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 for both liver cirrhosis and HCC (b) (× 100 power magnification), strong cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 at liver cirrhosis and weak cytoplasmic expression for FOSL1 at HCC (c, d) (× 100 and × 200 power magnification). FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of FOSL1 in HCC (× 400), showed combined weak cytoplasmic and moderate nuclear expression for FOSL1 (a), combined moderate cytoplasmic and strong nuclear expression (b), combined moderate cytoplasmic and weak nuclear expression (c), and combined strong cytoplasmic expression and strong nuclear expression for FOSL1 (d). FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Effect of tumor size, histologic grade, FOSL1 expression and tumor recurrence on OS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the cumulative (cum) OS according to the log rank test. The OS rate of the HCC patients with tumor size > 5 cm (red line) was significantly lower than that of the patients with tumor size < 5 cm (blue line) (a). The OS rate of the HCC patients with histological grade II and III (red and green lines) were significantly lower than that of the patients with histological grade I (blue line) (b). The OS rate of the HCC patients with strong FOSL1 expression (red line) was significantly lower than that of the patients with moderate or weak FOSL1 expression (green and blue line) (c). The OS rate of the HCC patients with recurrence (red line) and with no recurrence (blue line) (d). FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; OS: overall survival.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Demographic, Clinical and Characteristics of the Studied Cohort
 
VariableCategoryN = 113
TTT: treatment; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; SD: standard deviation; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma.
Age/yearsMean ± SD57.73 ± 7.3
Median (range)56 (47 - 74)
SexFemale26 (23.1%)
Male87 (76.9%)
Hepatitis infectionNo19 (16.8%)
HBV7 (6.3%)
HCV87 (76.9%)
History of antiviral TTTNo8 (7.2%)
Yes18 (15.9%)
Unknown87 (76.9%)
HCC gradeGrade I20 (17.7%)
Grade II45 (39.8%)
Grade III48 (42.5%)
AFP (ng/mL)Mean ± SD1,505.89 ± 391.3
Median (range)116 (9 - 1,886)

 

Table 2. Tumor-Related Factors Among the Studied Cohort
 
VariableCategoryN = 113
SD: standard deviation; LVE: lymphovascular embolization.
Tumor size (cm)Mean ± SD3.35 ± 1.9
Median (range)2.3 (1.5 - 8.2)
Tumor buddingLow39 (34.5%)
High74 (65.5%)
LVEPositive72 (63.7%)
NecrosisPositive30 (26.5%)
RecurrenceYes45 (39.8%)
MortalityYes69 (61.1%)

 

Table 3. Correlation Between FOSL1 Nuclear Expression and Clinicopathologic Features
 
CorrelateH score (n)P valueHR (95% CI)P value
Low (n = 58)High (n = 55)
*P < 0.05. AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; LC: liver cirrhosis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; LVE: lymphovascular embolization; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; FOSL1 (C): FOSL1 cytoplasmic expression.
Age/year
  < 50 years10 (15.8%)14 (22.2%)0.2881
  > 50 years48 (84.2%)41 (77.8%)0.66 (0.13 - 3.45)0.619
Sex
  Female10 (15.8%)16 (27.8%)0.2151
  Male48 (84.2%)39 (72.2%)0.49 (0.10 - 2.43)0.381
Tumor size
  < 5 cm45 (78.9%)39 (27.8%)0.2671
  > 5 cm13 (21.1%)16 (27.8%)1.44 (0.32 - 6.53)0.635
AFP
  > 200 ng/mL24 (42.1%)27 (50%)0.6301
  < 200 ng/mL34 (57.9%)28 (50%)0.73 (0.20 - 2.66)0.684
Histological grade
  Grade I15 (26.3%)5 (9.1%)0.0751
  Grade II/III43 (73.7%)50 (90.9%)6.07 (1.01 - 8.22)0.038*
Hepatitis infection
  No6 (10.5%)2 (3.6%)0.2251
  HCV/HBV52 (89.5%)53 (96.4%)0.41 (0.07 - 2.59)0.344
LC
  Negative13 (22.4%)9 (16.7%)0.2461
  Positive45 (77.6%)46 (83.3%)1.79 (0.36 - 8.90)0.479
LVE
  Negative31 (52.6%)10 (18.2%)0.022*1
  Positive27 (47.4%)45 (81.8%)5.56 (1.20 - 9.71)0.028*
Necrosis
  Negative43 (73.7%)40 (72.2%)0.6051
  Positive15 (26.3%)15 (27.8%)1.08 (0.25 - 4.60)0.847
Tumor budding
  Low31 (52.6%)8 (14.5%)0.020*1
  High27 (47.4%)47 (85.5%)5.56 (1.20 - 9.71)0.026*
FOSL1 (C)
  Low38 (65.5%)11 (20%)0.001*1
  High20 (34.5%)44 (80%)18.0 (1.96 - 34.9)0.011*
Recurrence
  No37 (63.2%)31 (55.6%)0.2351
  Yes21 (36.8%)24 (44.4%)1.38 (0.37 - 5.19)0.630
Mortality
  Alive22 (36.8%)22 (40%)0.8981
  Dead36 (63.2%)33 (60%)0.92 (0.24 - 3.46)0.904

 

Table 4. Correlation Between FOSL1 Cytoplasmic Expression and Clinicopathologic Features
 
CorrelateH score (n)P valueHR (95% CI)P value
Low (n = 58)High (n = 55)
*P < 0.05. AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; LC: liver cirrhosis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; LVE: lymphovascular embolization; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; FOSL1 (N): FOSL1 nuclear expression.
Age/years
  < 50 years13 (25%)11 (17.2%)0.2351
  > 50 years36 (75%)53 (82.8%)2.01 (0.38 - 9.58)0.415
Sex
  Female10 (18.7%)16 (25%)0.5171
  Male39 (81.3%)48 (75%)0.74 (0.15 - 3.69)0.712
Tumor size
  < 5 cm34 (68.7%)50 (78.1%)0.2101
  > 5 cm15 (31.3%)14 (21.9%)0.52 (0.11 - 2.36)0.395
AFP
  > 200 ng/mL25 (50.1%)26 (40.6%)0.4601
  < 200 ng/mL24 (49.9%)38 (59.4%)1.33 (0.36 - 4.93)0.666
Histological grade
  Grade I10 (18.7%)10 (15.6%)0.5281
  Grade II/III39 (81.3%)54 (84.4%)1.39 (0.24 - 7.99)0.716
Hepatitis infection
  No2 (4.1%)6 (9.4%)0.5281
  HCV/HBV47 (95.9%)58 (90.6%)1.39 (0.24 - 7.99)0.716
LC
  Negative13 (25%)9 (14.1%)0.4831
  Positive36 (75%)55 (85.9%)1.42 (0.30 - 6.81)0.664
LVE
  Negative21(42.6%)20 (31.2%)0.1741
  Positive28 (57.1%)44 (68.8%)1.94 (0.50 - 7.64)0.341
Necrosis
  Negative40 (81.6%)43 (67.2%)0.1871
  Positive9 (18.4%)21 (32.8%)2.17 (0.46 - 9.20)0.328
Tumor budding
  Low22 (43.8%)17 (26.6%)0.1741
  High27 (56.2%)47 (70.3%)1.94 (0.50 - 7.64)0.341
FOSL1 (N)
  Low38 (77.6%)20 (31.2%)0.008*1
  High11 (22.4%)44 (68.8%)0.11 (0.02 - 0.61)0.012*
Recurrence
  No34 (68.8%)34 (53.1%)0.2531
  Yes15 (31.2%)30 (48.4%)2.02 (0.51 - 7.80)0.318
Mortality
  Alive19 (37.5%)25 (38.1%)0.2671
  Dead30 (62.5%)39 (61.9%)0.98 (0.26 - 3.73)0.970

 

Table 5. Correlation Between Combined (N + C) FOSL1 Expression and Clinicopathological Features
 
CorrelateH score (N + C)P valueHR (95% CI)P value
Low (n = 27)High (n = 86)
*P < 0.05. AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1; LC: liver cirrhosis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; LVE: lymphovascular embolization; HR: hazard ratios; CI: confidence interval; N + C: nuclear and cytoplasmic expression.
Age/years
  < 50 years6 (22.2%)18 (20.9%)0.7711
  > 50 years21 (77.8%)68 (79.1%)1.31 (0.21 - 8.32)0.845
Sex
  Female3 (11.1%)23 (26.7%)0.3791
  Male24 (88.9%)63 (73.3%)0.38 (0.04 - 3.55)0.682
Tumor size
  < 5 cm21 (77.8%)63 (73.3%)0.8061
  > 5 cm6 (22.2%)23 (26.7%)1.17 (0.96 - 6.89)0.784
AFP
  > 200 ng/mL12 (44.4%)39 (45.3%)0.6121
  < 200 ng/mL15 (55.6%)47 (54.7%)0.92 (0.21 - 4.18)0.782
Histological grade
  Grade I15 (55.6%)5 (5.8%)0.028*1
  Grade II/III12 (44.4%)81 (94.2%)1.73 (0.36 - 8.35)0.034*
Hepatitis infection
  No6 (22.2%)2 (2.3%)0.4571
  HCV/HBV21 (77.8%)84 (97.7%)1.71 (0.26 - 9.41)0.574
LC
  Negative9 (33.3%)13 (15.1%)0.2931
  Positive18 (66.7%)73 (84.9%)2.31 (0.42 - 8.74)0.237
LVE
  Negative18 (66.7%)23 (26.7%)0.023*1
  Positive9 (33.3%)63 (73.3%)6.01 (1.18 - 14.58)0.031*
Necrosis
  Negative21 (77.8%)62 (72.1%)0.5371
  Positive6 (22.2%)24 (27.9%)1.41 (0.24 - 8.24)0.709
Bile duct proliferation
  Mild/moderate18 (66.7%)61 (70.9%)0.5461
  Severe9 (33.3%)25 (29.1%)0.81 (0.16 - 4.01)0.765
Tumor budding
  Low15 (55.6%)24 (27.9%)0.040*1
  High12 (44.4%)62 (72.1%)3.17 (1.05 - 9.72)0.046*
Recurrence
  No21 (77.8%)47 (54.7%)0.1861
  Yes6 (22.2%)39 (45.3%)3.03 (0.53 - 7.25)0.120
Mortality
  Alive21 (77.8%)23 (26.7%)0.034*1
  Dead6 (22.2%)64 (73.3%)1.44 (0.31 - 6.62)0.035*

 

Table 6. Correlation Between Clinicopathologic Features and Overall Survival Rate
 
PredictorSR%P valueHR (95% CI)P value
*P < 0.05. SR%: survival rate percentages; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals for risk of all causes; AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; LC: liver cirrhosis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCV: hepatitis C virus; LVE: lymphovascular embolization; FOSL1: FOS-like antigen 1.
Age/years
  < 50 years42.9%0.3131
  > 50 years36.7%1.468 (0.498 - 4.329)0.428
Sex
  Female62.5%0.0921
  Male31%2.384 (0.707 - 8.034)0.161
Tumor size
  < 5 cm42.9%0.034*1
  > 5 cm22.2%2.078 (1.041 - 5.138)0.043*
AFP
  > 200 ng/mL35.3%0.2551
  < 200 ng/mL40%0.889 (0.391 - 2.022)0.779
Histological grade
  Grade I41.9%0.041*1
  Grade II/III16.7%3.621 (1.077 - 6.118)0.046*
Hepatitis infection
  No33.3%0.5931
  HCV/HBV38.7%0.730 (0.246 - 2.163)0.570
LC
  Negative50%0.2301
  Positive34.5%1.394 (0.470 - 4.137)0.549
LVE
  Negative38.5%0.6131
  Positive37.5%0.871 (0.364 - 2.082)0.756
Necrosis
  Negative40.7%0.2561
  Positive30%1.335 (0.542 - 3.292)0.530
Bile duct proliferation
  Mild/moderate42.9%0.4211
  Severe34.7%1.079 (0.648 - 1.798)0.770
FOSL1
  Low46.8%0.044*1
  High33.1%4.112 (1.057 - 8.091)0.039*
Recurrence
  Negative59.1%0.4541
  Positive66.7%1.943 (0.412 - 2.160)0.302