World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.wjon.org

Review

Volume 15, Number 2, April 2024, pages 149-168


Pigs: Large Animal Preclinical Cancer Models

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Advantages and disadvantages of using small and large preclinical cancer models. Given the similarities between pigs and humans, the pigs lie closer on the scale of translatability to humans compared to small animal models.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Comparative genome viewer alignment comparison between human-pig vs. human-mouse. (a) Comparison between pigs and humans. (b) Comparison between mouse and humans. The colored ribbons represent assembly-to-assembly alignment segments. These are reciprocal best placed alignments by default. Purple represents reverse alignments and green represents forward alignments only. Overall, the comparative genomic viewer shows synteny between the two species that are in comparison. Thicker bands are representative of continuous homology between those species.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Orthologous analysis and comparison between humans, pigs, rats, mice and dogs. (a) Occurrence table presenting a unique number of shared homologous gene clusters among species along with the protein count on the right. (b) Venn diagram showing the number of shared orthologous gene clusters among species along with a bar graph comparison showing the number of orthologous clusters in each species. (c) Pairwise heat map comparison to visualize overlapping cluster numbers for five different species. Our orthologous analysis was conducted using default Orthofinder algorithm, with an e-value of 1 × 10-2, and inflation value of 1.50.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Expansion and contraction analysis of five species: mice, rats, pigs, dogs, and humans, respectively. In the pie charts, teal indicates expansions while black indicates contractions of orthologous gene clusters.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. General schematic representation and workflow of Oncopig lung cancer model.

Table

Table 1. Summary of Pig Models
 
Type of cancer/intervention methodsMethodGeneral commentsReferences
Glioma/glioblastomaU87 GM/G-6 (primary culture of GBM)[16-18]
Spinal cord gliomaLentiviral vectorsVector 1: PDGF-B-IRES-eGFP
Vector 2: HRASG12V-IRES-mPlum
Vector 3: pLKO1 backbone + shRNA targeting p53
[18]
Microbrachytherapy165Ho siloxane particlesU87 cells for tumorigenesis[19]
OsteosarcomaFetal fibroblasts Nuclear and Embryo transfer generating TP53+/+, TP53R167H/+, and TP53R167H/R167H[20]
MSCs xenografted AdCre inducible CAG-LSL-TP53R167H homozygous-KRASG12D heterozygous-MYC model[21]
MSCs Cre recombinase inducible TP53R167H followed by somatic cell transfer[22, 62]
Hematological malignanciesPartial T-cell depleted adult pig bone marrow injected into the intrahepatic portion of the umbilical vein of fetal swine via transuterine injectionDemonstrated chimerism and GVHD
MHG-MHC SLAcc (class Ic/IIc)
[23]
NK cells killed human cancer cell lines (pancreatic, melanoma and CML) in vitro in SCID pig modelLine of Yorkshire pigs that was selected for increased feed efficiency at Iowa State University[24]
Naturally occurring CML in MGH MHC pigs[25]
HCT (SCF/IL3 mobilized) injected into MGH MHC pigs + total body/thymic irradiation + T-cell depletion + cyclosporine A monotherapyMGH MHC pigs[26]
T- B- NK- SCID pig model by generating ART-/- IL2RG-/Y with CRISPR/Cas9 directed mutagenesis[27]
Colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel diseaseCRISPR/Cas9-mediated excision of the 93-bp fragment containing the ARE and CDE1 element + microinjecting guide RNA plasmids into in vitro fertilized porcine oocytes followed by laparoscopic embryo transferTNFΔARE pigs[28]
Gene-targeted cloned pigs carrying translational stop signals in the APC gene at codons 1061 and 1311[29]
CRISPR/Cas9 based LGR5-H2B-GFP modelOLFM4 expression (similar to human small intestine and colon)[30]
Pancreatic cancerAdCre CAG-LSL-KRASG12D-TP53R167H into the body of the pancreas or into the pancreatic duct pushed towards the pancreasSus scrofa pigs[31]
AdCre CAG-LSL-KRASG12D-TP53R167H Oncopig used with core biopsy of pancreas + incubation with AdCre then mixture injected back into pancreasOncopigs from University of Missouri National Swine Resource and Research Center[40]
Primary porcine fibroblasts with murine Pdx-1 promoter overexpression of oncogene cassette containing MYC, KRASG12D and SV40 LT + an inducible negative regulator protein (rtTR-KRAB) via somatic cell nuclear transferGottingen-Ellegaard minipig[32]
Transgenic Oncopigs (CAG-KRASG12D-IRES-TP53R167H)
Injection Technique 1: Main duct + parenchyma
Injection Technique 2: Connecting lobe
Oncopigs from University of Missouri National Swine Resource and Research Center[33]
Hepatocellular carcinomaAdCre in vitro expression of KRASG12D and TP53R167HMinnesota Minipig sire and Yorkshire dams and heterozygous for the transgene[34, 35]
Transarterial alcohol injectionModel for cirrhosis development
Sus scrofa
[34, 36]
AdCre KRASG12D TP53R167H Oncopig + CRISPR/Cas9-mediated ko ARID1A + AXIN1Orthotopic implantation of ko HCC cell in Oncopig model[37, 38]
Prevention of liver precancerous and cancerous lesionsModel of hereditary tyrosinemia type-1 treatment with in vivo lentiviral vector targeting human fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase transgeneFumarylacetoacetate hydrolase-/- via somatic cell transfer[39]
Immune therapyThermal ablation methodsEx vivo pig livers[41-43]
Vaccine-induced peptide-specific cytotoxic T-cell responsesOutbred Danish Landrace/Yorkshire/Duroc pigs[46]
Porcine kidney fibroblasts from male Gottingen minipig and transfected with IGH-γ1-γ4 and IGK expression vector. Followed by somatic cell nuclear transfer.Humanized Gottingen minipigs for toxicological testing of therapeutic recombinant antibodies[47]
CRISPR/Cas9 system used to induce deletions within exon 4 of porcine TRDC gene. Electroporation to transfect CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids + Intracytoplasmic microinjection + somatic cell nuclear transferTRDC-knockout German Landrace pigs lacking γδ T cells[48]
Preclinical testing of immunotherapies for tumor directed cytotoxicityOncopig model[49]
Autologous hepatocyte derived cell lines transformed using AdCre + transarterial embolization of liver cancerOncopig model[44]
XenotransplantationOncopig model[50-53]
Histotripsy[45]
Lung cancer
Potential interventions for lung cancer
pRosa26-iCas9 pigs by intra-nasal deliveryChinese Bama mini-pigs[60]
Endovascular and percutaneous (biopsy plus incubation with AdCre ex vivo followed by inoculation) delivery[61]
Microwave ablationOncopigs[54-56]
Conventional vs. cone beam CT to monitor microwave ablation[57]
Xenogeneic cross-circulation to support human donor[58, 59]