World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjon.org

Original Article

Volume 5, Number 3, June 2014, pages 118-125


Temozolomide and Reirradiation in Recurrent Grade II Brain Glioma

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Treatment protocol for the current study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Patient simulation and immobilization.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Time interval in the current series.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. The Kaplan-Meier curves of OS and PFS for the current study (P value 0.04).

Tables

Table 1. Response Definitions
 
Complete response (CR)Disappearance of all contrast-enhancing tumor.
Partial response (PR)50% or more reduction in the size of measurable disease.
Disease progression (DP)25% or more increase in the size of measurable disease.
Stable disease (SD)All other situations.

 

Table 2. Dose Modification Based on Hematological and Renal Function Results
 
Hematology
  For day 1
  Neutrophils (103/mL)Platelets (103/mL)Dose
    ≥ 1.5and> 100100%
    < 1.5or< 100Delay
Renal function test
  CreatinineDose
    < 2 upper normal limit100%
    ≥ 2 upper normal limitDelay
Liver function tests
  Bilirubin (µmol/L)ALT, ASTDose
    ≤ 25and≤ 2.5 upper normal limit100%
    > 25or> 2.5 upper normal limitDelay

 

Table 3. Patients’ and Disease’s Characteristics of the Current Study
 
CharacteristicsDetailsPatients No.Percentage (%)
Age18 - 20630
> 20 - 401155
> 40 - 60315
> 6000
SexMale1575
Female525
Performance status10036.7
90923.3
80843.3
70023.3
6003.3
PathologyLGG1890
Ependymoma210
Site of recurrenceTemporal lobe1365
Parietal lobe630
Cerebellar15
Pretreatment tumor size1 - 2 cm945
2 - 4 cm1155
> 5 cm00

 

Table 4. Characters of the Eight Patients Who Achieved Objective Responses
 
Patient numberResponse achievedAgeSexPSPathology typeTime interval
1CR27male100LGG15
2CR20male90LGG17
3PR18female90LGG12
4PR18male100LGG15
5PR18male90Ependymoma13
6PR31male90LGG16
7PR19female100LGG17
8PR32male90LGG12

 

Table 5. The 12-Month OS for Treatment Group Grouped by Prognostic Factors
 
12-month OSNumber (%)P value
Age
  < 40 years old16 (94%)0.001
  > 40 years old1 (33%)0.001
Performance status
  100-9011 (91%)0.6
  806 (75%)0.6
Tumor size
  < 2 cm8 (89%)0.03
  > 2 cm9 (81%)0.03
Time interval between the two RT courses
  8 - 12 months5 (71%)0.001
  12 - 16 months11 (91%)0.001
  16 - 18 months1 (100%)0.001