World J Oncol
World Journal of Oncology, ISSN 1920-4531 print, 1920-454X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, World J Oncol and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.wjon.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 1, February 2016, pages 1-4


The Clinical Importance of Measurement of Hematological Indices in the Breast Cancer Survivals: A Comparison Between Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women

Zhian M. I. Dezayeea, Marwan S. M. Al-Nimerb, c

aHawler University, College of Health Sciences, Erbil, Iraq
bDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriya University, P.O. Box 14132, Baghdad, Iraq
cCorresponding Author: Marwan S. M. Al-Nimer, Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriya University, P.O. Box 14132, Baghdad, Iraq

Manuscript accepted for publication January 26, 2016
Short title: Hematological Indices in Breast Cancer
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon956e

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Determination of the hematological indices is a useful prognostic laboratory investigation in the cancer research. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (LNR), red cell distribution width (RDW) and the platelet distribution width (PDW) are useful markers for the prediction and the prognosis of breast cancer. The aims of this study were to assess the hematological indices in breast cancer women survivals and to show if there were significant differences in these indices between pre- and postmenopausal women.

Methods: This observational study was carried out in the Nanakali Hospital in Erbil, Kurdistan region, Iraq. A total number of 120 women with breast cancer under different modalities of management were enrolled in this study. The patients were grouped into premenopausal (group I, n = 30) and postmenopausal (group II, n = 90) women and the hematological indices of all patients were determined.

Results: Significant low hemoglobin levels and red cell counts were observed among group II compared with group I patients. Group II women had significant high values of RDW and mean platelet volume (MPV) (16.68 ± 2.51 and 9.980 ± 1.271) compared with group I (15.12 ± 2.27 and 9.535 ± 1.082). There were insignificant differences between group I and group II regarding the values of the PWD, plateletcrit (PCT), NLR and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

Conclusions: We conclude that the low hemoglobin levels, and the high RDW and PDW are significantly existing in postmenopausal compared with premenopausal survival women, indicating that there are specific hematological indices associated with the postmenopausal survival of the breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Mean platelet volume; Red cell distribution width

Introduction▴Top 

Determinations of hematological indices are used in the assessment of the clinical entities related to the oncology [1]. There are four determinants of the blood platelet used in the clinical practice and they are helpful in the assessment of the pathological conditions [2]. They are platelets count, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW) and plateletcrit (PCT). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a useful marker for the prediction and the prognosis of breast cancer [3]. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is also used in parallel with the PDW in the assessment of breast cancer [4].

In invasive breast cancer, the pretreatment value of the MPV is significantly higher than post-treatment value and its value is significantly correlated with the primary tumor size and local or distant metastasis, suggesting that MPV is a good prognostic marker [5]. In postmenopausal breast cancer women treated with tamoxifen, an endocrine therapy, the value of MPV was significantly higher than the corresponding value at pretreatment level (8.97 fL versus 8.2 fL) [6].

A lower survival rate of breast cancer is significantly associated with high NLR (> 2.57) and RDW (> 13.45%) and the latter is significantly associated with a high RDW measurement [7]. Krenn-Pilko et al [8] found that the value of NLR ≥ 3.0 was associated with poor disease-free survivals of breast cancer women. In one study, it has been found that there is no relationship between NLR value and the clinicopathological factors of the breast cancer but a disease-free survival is shorter and a disease-relapse is higher among women with a high NLR [9]. Furthermore, a high NLR is a negative prognostic marker in breast cancer women and considered as a predictor for overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival in those patients [10]. Breast cancer women who had a high NLR and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at the pretreatment state carried a risk of a high mortality rate [11]. The rationale of this study is based on the fact that the hematological index values are influenced by hormonal disturbances whether of endogenous or exogenous origin in women with breast cancer. Therefore, the aims of this study were to assess the hematological indices in breast cancer women survivals and to show if there were significant differences in these indices between pre- and postmenopausal women.

Patients and Methods▴Top 

This observational study was carried out in the Nanakali Hospital in Erbil, Kurdistan region. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki with approval from a local ethical review board. A consent form was obtained from each patient before enrollment into the study. The criteria of inclusion were the survivals of breast cancer under different modalities of management. The present study excluded the patients with a history of rheumatic conditions, hematological, neoplastic, renal, hepatic or thyroid diseases, or patients receiving treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs.

The patients were grouped according to the status of menopause: group I (n = 30): premenopausal women; group II (n = 90): postmenopausal women.

Demographic data, medical history and treatment were collected in the center. Modifiable risk factors, events or complications, and current therapy were recorded. A person who reported smoking on admission was defined as current smoker. A venous blood sample was obtained from each patient and collected in the EDTA (anticoagulant) tube for measurement of hematological indices using the Coulter machine (HmX Hematology Analyzer with Autoloader, Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA). The hematological indices included hemoglobin, red cell count, white cell count, differential white cells, platelet count, MPV, PCT, RWD and PDW. The NLR and PLR were calculated simply by dividing the number of neutrophil or platelet to the number of lymphocyte cells. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was traditionally measured using the Westergren method.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as number, percent, and mean ± SD. Unpaired Student’s t-test and differences between percentages were used to evaluate differences between the two. For all tests, a two-tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All calculations were made using Excel 2003 program for Windows.

Results▴Top 

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the patients. Postmenopausal women were significantly older than corresponding premenopausal women. There was an insignificant difference in residency, marital status, history of current smoking and oral contraceptive pills intake, and a family history of breast cancer. Screening of the hematological indices revealed significant low red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels, while RWD and PWD values were significantly higher in postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women (Table 2). The MPV, PCT, NLR and PLR values were non-significantly higher among postmenopausal women compared with premenopausal women (Table 2).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Characteristics of the Patients Enrolled in the Study
 

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Data Analysis of Hematological Indices
 
Discussion▴Top 

The results of this study show that postmenopausal women with breast cancer have a significant RDW and PDW compared with premenopausal women. There is no significant difference between pre- and postmenopausal women about the characteristics data at the time of the entry into the study. Therefore, these factors do not bias the results observed in this study. It is expected that the age of postmenopausal women is significantly higher than the corresponding age of the premenopausal women. Low hemoglobin level is reported in elderly patients with breast cancer treated with different modalities of therapeutic tools and this explains the significant low hemoglobin levels among postmenopausal patients [12]. Chemotherapeutic agents prescribed to the patients are also responsible for the low levels of red cell counts and hemoglobin as mentioned in recent studies [13]. Moreover, the low hemoglobin levels in cancer patients are of multifactorial etiology, in which nutritional, inflammatory, metabolic, immunological, radiotherapy and cytotoxic medications are involved in its pathogenesis [14]. Postmenopausal women have a significant high RDW compared with premenopausal women, indicating that the patients may carry a high rate of morbidity as Riedl et al [15] reported that RDW is an independent risk factor of poor survival in cancer. The results of the study by Seretis et al [16] showed that RDW is a marker of breast cancer activity as a significant high level found in breast cancer compared with breast fibroadenoma. Therefore, the results of this study show that the postmenopausal women may have active breast cancer compared with premenopausal women. A recent study demonstrates that a high PDW value is an independent predictive marker of breast cancer [1]. The results of this study are the high PDW value observed in breast cancer and the significant high levels observed in postmenopausal women. Moreover, Okuturlar et al [1] demonstrated that a cut-off value of NLR of 2.56 is considered as a prediction of breast cancer while this study shows that the mean value of NLR does not reach the cut-off value. Therefore, the importance of measuring the NLR in established and treated breast cancer is less useful. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that NLR is a significant independent marker of a poor prognosis for the subtype triple negative breast cancer [17]. An insignificant difference between premenopausal and postmenopausal women in a PLR indicates that the PLR is not a useful marker. Ulas et al [9] found that PLR is not a useful marker to assess the breast cancer free survival or overall survival. Limitations of the study are the variations in the breast cancer subtypes, the type of the cytotoxic drug regimen, and the other risk factors of breast cancer. However, in conclusion, the low hemoglobin levels, and the high RDW and PDW are significantly existing in postmenopausal compared with premenopausal survival women, indicating that there are specific hematological indices associated with the postmenopausal survival of the breast cancer patients.


References▴Top 
  1. Okuturlar Y, Gunaldi M, Tiken EE, Oztosun B, Inan YO, Ercan T, Tuna S, et al. Utility of peripheral blood parameters in predicting breast cancer risk. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2409-2412.
    doi pubmed
  2. Roop RP, Naughton MJ, Van Poznak C, Schneider JG, Lammers PE, Pluard TJ, Johnson F, et al. A randomized phase II trial investigating the effect of platelet function inhibition on circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013;13(6):409-415.
    doi pubmed
  3. Lee SK, Choi MY, Bae SY, Lee JH, Lee HC, Kil WH, Lee JE, et al. Immediate postoperative inflammation is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Oncology. 2015;88(6):337-344.
    doi pubmed
  4. Wang C, Civan J, Lai Y, Cristofanilli M, Hyslop T, Palazzo JP, Myers RE, et al. Racial disparity in breast cancer survival: the impact of pre-treatment hematologic variables. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(1):45-56.
    doi pubmed
  5. Gu M, Zhai Z, Huang L, Zheng W, Zhou Y, Zhu R, Shen F, et al. Pre-treatment mean platelet volume associates with worse clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2015.
    doi pubmed
  6. Karagoz B, Bilgi O, Alacacioglu A, Ozgun A, Sayan O, Erikci AA, Kandemir EG. Mean platelet volume increase after tamoxifen, but not after anastrazole in adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2010;27(2):199-202.
    doi pubmed
  7. Yao M, Liu Y, Jin H, Liu X, Lv K, Wei H, Du C, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory markers in Chinese patients with breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2014;7:1743-1752.
    pubmed
  8. Krenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Stojakovic T, Pichler M, Gerger A, Kapp KS, Langsenlehner T. The elevated preoperative derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor clinical outcome in breast cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2015.
    doi pubmed
  9. Ulas A, Avci N, Kos T, Cubukcu E, Olmez OF, Bulut N, Degirmenci M. Are neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio associated with prognosis in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab? J BUON. 2015;20(3):714-722.
    pubmed
  10. Chen J, Deng Q, Pan Y, He B, Ying H, Sun H, Liu X, et al. Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer. FEBS Open Bio. 2015;5:502-507.
    doi pubmed
  11. Koh CH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Ng KL, Jabir RS, Tan GH, See MH, Jamaris S, et al. Utility of pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factors in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(1):150-158.
    doi pubmed
  12. He S, Lingyun Z, Yunpeng L. [Analysis of postoperative chemotherapy-related anemia in elderly cancer patients]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015;37(4):290-292.
    pubmed
  13. Dranitsaris G, Gluck S, Faria C, Cox D, Rugo H. Comparative effectiveness analysis of monotherapy with cytotoxic agents in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer in a community setting. Clin Ther. 2015;37(1):134-144.
    doi pubmed
  14. Maccio A, Madeddu C, Gramignano G, Mulas C, Tanca L, Cherchi MC, Floris C, et al. The role of inflammation, iron, and nutritional status in cancer-related anemia: results of a large, prospective, observational study. Haematologica. 2015;100(1):124-132.
    doi pubmed
  15. Riedl J, Posch F, Konigsbrugge O, Lotsch F, Reitter EM, Eigenbauer E, Marosi C, et al. Red cell distribution width and other red blood cell parameters in patients with cancer: association with risk of venous thromboembolism and mortality. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e111440.
    doi pubmed
  16. Seretis C, Seretis F, Lagoudianakis E, Gemenetzis G, Salemis NS. Is red cell distribution width a novel biomarker of breast cancer activity? Data from a pilot study. J Clin Med Res. 2013;5(2):121-126.
    doi
  17. Jia W, Wu J, Jia H, Yang Y, Zhang X, Chen K, Su F. The Peripheral Blood Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Superior to the Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio for Predicting the Long-Term Survival of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143061.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


World Journal of Oncology is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

World Journal of Oncology, bimonthly, ISSN 1920-4531 (print), 1920-454X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.wjon.org   editorial contact: editor@wjon.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.